How Reliable Are Your Smartwatch’s Health Stats?

Kunal Kalra - profile photo
· 4 min read
Sponsored Sponsored advertisement for Brooks Running
15% off full-price styles · Use code KEEPACTIVE · Ends 30 September
Sponsored Sponsored advertisement for Brooks Running
15% off full-price styles · Use code KEEPACTIVE · Ends 30 September
How Reliable Are Your Smartwatch’s Health Stats?

Wearable technologies have become an integral part of daily life for many Australians, with smartwatches leading the charge. According to the Telsyte Australian Smartphone & Wearable Devices Market Study 2023, 36% of Australians now own a smartwatch—a figure that has grown by 4% in just a year. As these devices become more sophisticated, integrating health, fitness, and connectivity features, their role in our lives has expanded significantly. But with this growth comes an important question: just how accurate are these devices in monitoring our health?

The Popularity of Wearables in Australia

Australians are among the most enthusiastic adopters of wearable technologies, particularly smartwatches. These devices have evolved beyond simple fitness trackers to become essential tools for many users. Whether it’s monitoring heart rate, tracking sleep patterns, or measuring physical activity, smartwatches are now a common sight on Australian wrists.

As tech analyst firm Global Data notes, the popularity of smartwatches has soared as they’ve matured into multifunctional devices. They are not just gadgets but are becoming critical components of the broader mobile ecosystem. This trend is expected to continue, with new forms of wearable technology on the horizon.

What the Research Says

A recent comprehensive review published in Sports Medicine took a deep dive into the accuracy of these wearable devices, particularly focusing on how well they measure key physiological outcomes. The review analysed 24 systematic reviews encompassing 249 validation studies and involving over 430,000 participants. Here’s what the findings revealed:

  • Heart Rate Monitoring: Wearables showed a relatively small margin of error, with a mean bias of ±3%. For most users, this means that heart rate data from wearables is fairly reliable.

  • Arrhythmia Detection: In this area, the devices performed exceptionally well, with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 95%, respectively, making them effective at detecting irregular heart rhythms.

  • VO2max Estimation: Wearables were less accurate in estimating VO2max, overestimating it by ±15.24% during resting tests and ±9.83% during exercise tests.

  • Physical Activity Intensity: The accuracy of wearables in measuring physical activity intensity varied widely, with a mean absolute error ranging from 29% to 80%, depending on the activity level.

  • Step Counts and Energy Expenditure: Wearables tended to underestimate step counts, with errors ranging from -9% to +12%. Energy expenditure was also underestimated by an average of 3%, with a wider error margin of -21.27% to 14.76%.

  • Blood Oxygen Saturation: The devices were reasonably accurate in measuring blood oxygen levels, with a mean absolute difference of up to 2.0%.

  • Sleep Monitoring: Wearables were found to overestimate total sleep time by more than 10%, which might not be a major concern for casual users but could affect those relying on these devices for detailed sleep analysis.

The Need for Standardisation

The review highlighted a significant issue: the lack of standardised validation protocols across different studies and devices. This variability makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the overall accuracy of wearables. To improve the reliability of these devices, more collaborative efforts between researchers, manufacturers, and healthcare professionals are needed.

Closing Summary

For Australians who rely on wearables to monitor their health, this research offers valuable insights. While these devices show great potential, their accuracy is not yet at a level where they can fully replace traditional medical assessments. However, they remain useful tools for gaining insights into one’s health and encouraging an active lifestyle. As wearable technology continues to evolve, we can expect these devices to become even more reliable.

For now, it’s important to view wearables as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, professional healthcare monitoring. As these devices become more integrated with other emerging technologies, they may offer even more personalised and intuitive experiences, further embedding themselves into our daily lives.

Ready to get active?

Find local activities, venues, and events near you.

Back to blog Back to home
VICTOR Smart Badminton Racquet: What It Tracks

VICTOR Smart Badminton Racquet: What It Tracks

15 Sep 2026 · 4 min read

VICTOR Intelligence puts a rechargeable sensor in the end of a badminton racquet and sends the results to a phone. Its beta app tracks smash power, shot mix and changes across a match or several sessions. That could help players spot patterns that are hard to feel on court, but...

How Behavioural Science Helps You Choose the Right Gym

How Behavioural Science Helps You Choose the Right Gym

14 Sep 2026 · 5 min read

A gym can look impressive and still be hard to keep using. Behavioural research and Australian stories point to a simpler test: can you reach it easily, enjoy the session, ask for help and return after a break? Julie Dickson's experience and an Auslan-led Queensland gym show how support can...

Move Well Brisbane: What the $5.6m Plan Adds

Move Well Brisbane: What the $5.6m Plan Adds

11 Sep 2026 · 3 min read

Gina used Brisbane's former Growing Older and Living Dangerously (GOLD) activities program to try circuit training, canoeing and more. Rhonda attended council yoga for a year and looked forward to returning each week. Brisbane City Council is now spending $5.6 million on Move Well Brisbane, with more free and low-cost...

What Age Can Kids Start Sport in Australia?

What Age Can Kids Start Sport in Australia?

10 Sep 2026 · 4 min read

Most junior sport programs start between ages three and five, but each code uses a different pathway. Compare Auskick, MiniRoos, Cricket Blast, NetSetGO and Hot Shots before choosing a local session.

How Community Sport Works in Australia: Clubs, Fees and Registration

How Community Sport Works in Australia: Clubs, Fees and Registration

05 Sep 2026 · 7 min read

New to community sport? Learn who runs local competitions, what registration fees cover, when to sign up and what to ask a club before paying.

Looking to get active?

Here is a few options to explore: